From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Cohen <dacohen@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] headers: fix circular dependency between linux/sched.h and linux/wait.h
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:27:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110221172756.GA27664@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110221172103.GA26225@redhat.com>
On 02/21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 02/21, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > afaict its needed because struct signal_struct and struct sighand_struct
> > include a wait_queue_head_t. The inclusion seems to come through
> > completion.h, but afaict we don't actually need to include completion.h
> > because all we have is a pointer to a completion, which is perfectly
> > fine with an incomplete type.
> >
> > This all would suggest we move the signal bits into their own header
> > (include/linux/signal.h already exists and seems inviting).
>
> Agreed, sched.h contatins a lot of garbage, including the signal bits.
>
> As for signal_struct in particular I am not really sure, it is just
> misnamed. It is in fact "struct process" or "struct thread_group". But
> dequeue_signal/etc should go into signal.h.
>
> The only problem, it is not clear how to test such a change.
Ah. sched.h includes signal.h, the testing is not the problem.
So, we can (at least) safely move some declarations.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-21 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-21 14:38 [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix linux/wait.h header file David Cohen
2011-02-21 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] headers: fix circular dependency between linux/sched.h and linux/wait.h David Cohen
2011-02-21 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-21 16:03 ` David Cohen
2011-02-21 16:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-21 16:29 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-21 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-21 16:54 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-21 17:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-21 17:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-02-21 19:21 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-02-21 17:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-21 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-02-22 15:38 ` David Cohen
2011-02-21 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix linux/wait.h header file Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110221172756.GA27664@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=dacohen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.