From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f175.google.com ([209.85.215.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Prycg-0000Q7-Tg for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:14:15 +0100 Received: by eye27 with SMTP id 27so822406eye.6 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:12:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=FYK1WGaec+y8M7H7paJ8+LUCpjU3rZHsExXxtRJhyvc=; b=mnoq54dX2df3Wy6IFBWctM+hO66ex86qd9eb1PbQcpFIQYt5Yf9aN8ATv4a9Sr3aBi kqweS4KsTv4K5D7wPV6SdGIhN6xeL1YrplfXcLZ/uKPfDQl6Wa3EPElrKVAdW7WExiR9 umHG041xENQk88+SdUVD7E4+o5rduBk4tOHW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=vHkD/deZ50ltQ2UVkQnhriWkR3w1nJVWcvVjj5KdtWcm6c/fGlEE+C/Y/lW4EzTmdm +t0t6qUAI35eBiw8ULFL2FUekL7q95KQv2mRi32lRxMCRd6UkmvilaBXkoYGED+JZNQg bYCCvq4gYno6BbXXG7NhEJxiKF7Uoa1hIKZvs= Received: by 10.223.114.203 with SMTP id f11mr3908311faq.20.1298405477126; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:11:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm3262922fav.8.2011.02.22.12.11.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:11:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:11:08 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20110222201107.GB3970@localhost.jama.net> References: <4D63F7F9.7000804@eukrea.com> <4D63FF5C.30400@opendreambox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4D63FF5C.30400@opendreambox.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with PPP X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:14:15 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 29576 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:24:28PM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 02/22/2011 06:52 PM, Eric Benard wrote: > > On 22/02/2011 18:22, Mickael Chazaux wrote: > >> I have a hard time figuring out why bitbake seems to mix versions of > >> ppp... Any ideas? > >> > > strange, which distro, git tag, bitbake version are you using ? > >=20 > > Both bitbake ppp-2.4.5 & bitbake -b > > openembedded/recipes/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb work fine here (angstrom 2008.1, > > armv5 target, bitbake 1.12.0). >=20 > I don't think this has anything to do with ppp. I faced the same issue > with a local recipe, of which an older version had been built before. > When packaging, the old version was used. A new workdir was created for > the old version during this step and the resulting packages were empty. > No recipe existed for this old version at that time, i.e. PR had already > been increased to 1.0, but 0.0 was used by bitbake. >=20 > In the end, I deleted bitbake's cache and all files matching the > package's name to get rid of the annoying problem. I think there were > pstage packages of the old version lying around. This wrong behavior is quite common ie after changing PACKAGE_ARCH, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg04= 280.html --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk1kGFsACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBx6bgCguo+8at7b9WsrvEUy4x2ScAs8 kF0AnR/fKqxZKvb0d/wVsoAQbFC1EEW+ =E/c9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y--