From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 09/12] xen: events: update pirq_to_irq in xen_create_msi_irq Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:08:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20110223150814.GA9801@dumpdata.com> References: <1298047386.16356.3620.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1298047417-7445-9-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <20110222203555.GA4605@dumpdata.com> <1298467228.16356.11037.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1298467228.16356.11037.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:20:28PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:35 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:43:34PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > I don't think this was a deliberate ommision. > > > > > > Makes the tail end of this function look even more like > > > xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq. > > > > I sense a trend here .. :-) > > It's almost like I had an agenda :-) The force is strong with your agenda... so I put your patches in #stable/irq.cleanup and merged it in #linux-next. Was the question that Stefano had answered? Also tested on dom0, PV, PV+PCI, PVonHVM, PVonHVM+PCI with a 82576 and 82574 Intel NIC.