From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cedric Sodhi Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:23:01 +0100 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Fighting with the driver In-Reply-To: <20110223165648.GB1988@fly> References: <20110223165648.GB1988@fly> Message-ID: <20110223172301.GD1988@fly> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Hello, I had a little trouble with the smtp header, if you have not read the message, it is again below. A little update: I managed to enable WIRELESS_EXT, which didn't help much though. A few of the wpa_supplicant errors are gone, but SIOCSIFFLAGS: Unknown error 132 remains there, two times. wpa_supplicant wont run. Besides, for some reason, the interface is always renaming itsself to wlan1. Thanks On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Cedric Sodhi wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to ask for some help from you getting a > > TL-WN721N > > presumably based upon an Atheros 9271 chipset to work. > That's of course my priority, but I also have some questions, trying to > understand why it is so difficult to get this device to work. > > So first of all, I have naively tried to simply compile the kernel with > > CONFIG_ATH9K_HTC=y > > and with the according ar9271.fw in /lib/firmware. It didn't work, the > device would not respond properly. My first question: > > IF the correct drivers for this device exist, why are they not in the > kernel? Why is it not possible to have a specific CONFIG_ line in the > kernel that allows me to use my device - why does it have to get > complicated? > > So after this didn't work I made some research and basically ended up > at > > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k_htc > > I followed that guide, selecting, for reasons that remain unclear to me, > the required entries (as listed in that guide) as Module. I then tried > to make compat-wireless which unexpectedly requested that I also > compiled > > CONFIG_CFG80211=m > > instead of =y. So I did that. Question: Why is there no mention of that > in the guide? > > I did that. And then make said, that > > CONFIG_CFG80211_WEXT will be deactivated or not working > > because CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=n and that iwconfig will not work. Well, > first of all I figured no way to enable WIRELESS_EXT, how would I? And > then, question: Why is that happening only for the ath9k_hcl driver from > compat-wireless? iwconfig works fine with the kernel-shipped ath9k_hcl > (although latter does not work with the chipset). > > I then restarted, but I just got a couple of errors when wpa_supplicant > tried to start > > ioctl[SIO...]: Operation not supported > > which, I assume, has to do with wext being unfunctional. So what now? I > have to enable WIRELESS_EXT somehow? How? And why is there no mention of > all this in that guide? > > Thanks for your help! > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel