From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9tetiar?= <ynezz@true.cz>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:21:57 +0100
Subject: [ath9k-devel] What would be the best chipset for
	wireless	router/AP on linux?
In-Reply-To: <20110224093636.4259.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <AANLkTimeGB9y3uB8ttmzit0b=-XYmV5oPfaB=fERQquC@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin-7Nyygt+Fi=fzjQX+06ZwoxmapJBFX8RpueD3@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinm-fGiq3vN9Bo1jDDsyKg50a6skwZxrPZc-vEU@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110224093636.4259.qmail@stuge.se>
Message-ID: <20110224152157.GX10042@ibawizard.net>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> [2011-02-24 10:36:35]:

> One solution is of course to modify the Linux kernel driver so that
> it ignores the regulatory domain completely, as the reviewer
> mentions, as long as you keep in mind that this may lead to you
> breaking the law.

IANAL but I think, that I'm not breaking any laws if I modify the driver in a
way, that I force the driver to use correct regulation domain of Czech
Republic, country where I live, instead of the eeprom programmed China.  Or am
I wrong?

-- ynezz