From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:09:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20110227120949.GF16453@elte.hu> References: <20110225180633.857892225@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> <20110225180634.017570095@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110225180634.017570095@gulag1.americas.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Travis Cc: David Rientjes , Jack Steiner , Robin Holt , Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Yinghai Lu , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Linus Torvalds , Yinghai Lu List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org * Mike Travis wrote: > On larger systems, because of the numerous ACPI, Bootmem and EFI > messages, the static log buffer overflows before the larger one > specified by the log_buf_len param is allocated. Minimize the > potential for overflow by allocating the new log buffer as soon > as possible. > > We do this by changing the log_buf_len from an early_param to a > _setup param. But _setup params are processed before the > alloc_bootmem is available, so this function will now just save > the requested log buf len. The real work routine (setup_log_buf) > is called after bootmem is available. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis > Reviewed-by: Jack Steiner > Reviewed-by: Robin Holt > --- > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 5 +++ > include/linux/printk.h | 4 ++ > init/main.c | 1 > kernel/printk.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) Well, the modern allocation method is memblock - available on all major architectures. You could avoid all this ugly workaround of bootmem limitations by moving the allocation to memblock_alloc() and desupporting the log_buf_len= boot parameter on non-memblock architectures. kernel log buffer size can be configured via the .config so they will not be left without larger buffers. Doing this should also have the advantage of getting all the early x86 messages into the larger buffer already, reducing the pressure to apply some of the other patches in your series. Thanks, Ingo