From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Re: [GIT PULL] Add bind_interdomain_evtchn_to_irqhandler (needed for netback, pciback etc) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20110228150556.GE10846@dumpdata.com> References: <1298889641.5034.586.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1298889863.5034.589.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20110228144216.GB10846@dumpdata.com> <1298905030.5034.653.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1298905030.5034.653.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:57:10PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 14:42 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:44:23AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > Ooops, hit send by mistake. > > > > > > I was about to say, can someone take this into their linux-next branch > > > for 2.6.39, I'd like to base my netback branch on it, the other > > > prerequisites are upstream already. > > > > > > Konrad, you have this commit in some of your branches already but it is > > > entangled with pciback. If you would rather disentangle it than take > > > this specific pull request that would be fine too. > > > > I disentagled it and stuck some other ones as well, but let me just > > make one branch with this particular patch. > > > > stable/backends > > > > It should show up in 10 minutes or so. > > Thanks. Are you sticking it in linux-next too? and in #master, #devel/next-2.6.38