All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Ibragimov Rinat <ibragimovrinat@mail.ru>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-write support
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:05:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110228210541.GF28617@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1hbbnoqt2.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:19:21PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Kind of, yes. But that involves teaching every ATA driver in $LEGACY_OS
> about 4KB logical blocks. There is little value is switching to 4KB
> logical blocks in the first place. So the claim is that it is easier to
> stick with 512-byte addressing, leave the I/O stack intact, and require
> the filesystem to always issue aligned units of 4KB.
> 
> That saves the drive vendors from implementing RMW logic and puts the
> burden on us. Perfect deal.

So it there a reliable way to detect that disk drives that don't have
the Read-Modify-Write logic?  If that can be reflected up the I/O
layer I can have mke2fs enforce that restriction, which currently we
only enforce if the logical blocksize is 4k.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-28 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-26 18:24 [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-write support Ibragimov Rinat
2011-02-28 14:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-28 14:58   ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 18:09     ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 20:19       ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 21:05         ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2011-02-28 21:10           ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-28 21:22             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 21:57               ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-01 15:19                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 21:20           ` James Bottomley
2011-02-28 21:24             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 21:23           ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 22:52       ` [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-writesupport Ibragimov Rinat
2011-03-01 22:16       ` Ibragimov Rinat
2011-03-10 17:01         ` Ibragimov Rinat
2011-02-28 17:54   ` [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-write support Ibragimov Rinat
2012-09-27 11:41     ` Mike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110228210541.GF28617@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ibragimovrinat@mail.ru \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.