From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reverting NUMA-affine page table allocation
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:19:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302181941.GD13693@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6E8874.6070000@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 10:08 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >> To me, it seems complicated for not good enough reasons. I'll defer
> >> the decision to x86 maintainers. Ingo, hpa, Thomas, what do you guys
> >> think?
> >
> > Would be nice to see an actual patch that does the revert.
> >
>
> I also would like to point out that we are at -rc7. The time to test
> new things is quickly running out, so a more conservative option for
> this upcoming merge window is starting to look good.
Hm, i thought the revert was for tip:x86/mm, not x86/urgent. The development window
for 2.6.39 is closing down.
A revert (without an actual bug that it fixes) for -rc8 is definitely out of
question.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-26 14:37 [RFC] Reverting NUMA-affine page table allocation Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 8:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-01 22:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 16:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 16:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-03-02 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 18:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-03-02 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-03-02 18:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-02 18:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302181941.GD13693@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.