From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86: Work around old gas bug
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:35:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302213553.88ec33cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299130025.19589.89.camel@sli10-conroe>
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:27:05 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 00:24 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:41:44 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > Meanwhile, what i hate more than ugly code repetition is code that does not build at
> > > all on akpm's test environment ;-)
> >
> > I hadn't got around to testing it. Bad news :(
> >
> Andrew,
> can you this on your side? this is what Jan proposed. I can only test a
> latest binutils here.
Nope.
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:985: Error: too many positional arguments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-03 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 23:52 + x86-work-around-old-gas-bug.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2011-03-02 8:42 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: Work around old gas bug tip-bot for Shaohua Li
2011-03-02 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-02 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-02 16:24 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-03 5:27 ` Shaohua Li
2011-03-03 5:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-03-03 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2011-03-03 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-03 5:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-02 12:49 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-03 10:55 [PATCH] x86: work around old gas bug (try 2) Jan Beulich
2011-03-03 11:52 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: Work around old gas bug tip-bot for Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302213553.88ec33cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.