From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
To: David Fries <david@fries.net>
Cc: Liang Bao <tim.bao@gmail.com>,
Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@motorola.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] work around for l2cap NULL dereference in l2cap_conn_start
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 23:12:57 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110305021257.GD9005@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110302061910.GE22204@spacedout.fries.net>
Hi David,
* David Fries <david@fries.net> [2011-03-02 00:19:10 -0600]:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:30:22PM -0300, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > * David Fries <david@fries.net> [2011-02-27 23:03:40 -0600]:
> >
> > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0300, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > > > I pushed the following patch to bluetooth-2.6 tree. It should fix the problem
> > > > by avoiding connections to be accepted before a L2CAP info response comes:
> > >
> > > Is
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/padovan/bluetooth-2.6.git
> > > the bluetooth-2.6 tree you mentioned? I don't see your patch there.
> > > As a side note, the inline patch in your e-mail has the tabs replaced by
> > > spaces, once I changed them, it applied cleanly.
> > >
> > > I first reverted to the base N900 kernel-power-2.6.28 46 (none of my
> > > changes or debugging), it crashed as expected. I then applied your
> > > patch 743400e0, and it still crashed. I added back the
> > > l2cap_conn_start parent check and some debugging in af_bluetooth.c
> > > dmesg debug output and patches follow.
> >
> > I want to see a test with this patch and a recent kernel. We added many fixes
> > to stack in the last two years. Can you test this scenario?
>
> I'm sorry, but apparently not, at least this post says 2.6.37 isn't
> going to happen for the N900 and Maemo.
> http://forums.internettablettalk.com/showthread.php?t=70082
>
> I tried 2.6.37-n900 from
> git://gitorious.org/nokia-n900-kernel/nokia-n900-kernel.git anyway,
> but the display visibly degrades like it isn't being updated and
> doesn't apparently get any further. I don't have anyway to debug it
> further.
I think you can test this in a desktop machine.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-05 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-11 3:53 [HACK PATCH] N900 l2cap connect crash, NULL parent David Fries
2011-02-14 14:56 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-02-14 21:40 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-02-21 4:36 ` [PATCH] work around for l2cap NULL dereference in l2cap_conn_start David Fries
2011-02-21 6:41 ` Liang Bao
2011-02-27 19:15 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-02-28 5:03 ` David Fries
2011-02-28 17:30 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-03-02 6:19 ` David Fries
2011-03-05 2:12 ` Gustavo F. Padovan [this message]
2011-03-22 2:30 ` David Fries
2011-03-24 15:37 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2011-03-02 1:31 ` Andrei Warkentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110305021257.GD9005@joana \
--to=padovan@profusion.mobi \
--cc=andreiw@motorola.com \
--cc=david@fries.net \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.bao@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.