From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, anton@samba.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/kexec: Speedup kexec hash PTE tear down
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:23:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307115309.GG8194@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
powerpc/kexec: Speedup kexec hash PTE tear down
Commit: d504bed676caad29a3dba3d3727298c560628f5c upstream
Currently for kexec the PTE tear down on 1TB segment systems normally
requires 3 hcalls for each PTE removal. On a machine with 32GB of
memory it can take around a minute to remove all the PTEs.
This optimises the path so that we only remove PTEs that are valid.
It also uses the read 4 PTEs at once HCALL. For the common case where
a PTEs is invalid in a 1TB segment, this turns the 3 HCALLs per PTE
down to 1 HCALL per 4 PTEs.
This gives an > 10x speedup in kexec times on PHYP, taking a 32GB
machine from around 1 minute down to a few seconds.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 2011-03-07 00:50:53.695992154 -0800
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 2011-03-07 02:09:06.133815481 -0800
@@ -366,21 +366,28 @@
{
unsigned long size_bytes = 1UL << ppc64_pft_size;
unsigned long hpte_count = size_bytes >> 4;
- unsigned long dummy1, dummy2, dword0;
+ struct {
+ unsigned long pteh;
+ unsigned long ptel;
+ } ptes[4];
long lpar_rc;
- int i;
+ int i, j;
- /* TODO: Use bulk call */
- for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i++) {
- /* dont remove HPTEs with VRMA mappings */
- lpar_rc = plpar_pte_remove_raw(H_ANDCOND, i, HPTE_V_1TB_SEG,
- &dummy1, &dummy2);
- if (lpar_rc == H_NOT_FOUND) {
- lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_raw(0, i, &dword0, &dummy1);
- if (!lpar_rc && ((dword0 & HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK)
- != HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK))
- /* Can be hpte for 1TB Seg. So remove it */
- plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i, 0, &dummy1, &dummy2);
+ /* Read in batches of 4,
+ * invalidate only valid entries not in the VRMA
+ * hpte_count will be a multiple of 4
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < hpte_count; i += 4) {
+ lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_4_raw(0, i, (void *)ptes);
+ if (lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS)
+ continue;
+ for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
+ if ((ptes[j].pteh & HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK) ==
+ HPTE_V_VRMA_MASK)
+ continue;
+ if (ptes[j].pteh & HPTE_V_VALID)
+ plpar_pte_remove_raw(0, i + j, 0,
+ &(ptes[j].pteh), &(ptes[j].ptel));
}
}
}
reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307115309.GG8194@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.