From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Fleischer Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:29:01 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] Special version of list where post doesn't get sent back Message-Id: <20110309172901.GB32322@blizzard> List-Id: References: <20110308154817.GB4806@barfooze.de> In-Reply-To: <20110308154817.GB4806@barfooze.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:21:44AM +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote: > A 'global option' implementation of this is in version control (it was > one of my priorities when choosing an MLM, and since Mlmmj ticked most > other boxes, I chose to use Mlmmj and implement that feature myself). It > will be in 1.2.18 when it finally gets out, hopefully soon.... I use it > in production and it seems to work fine. > > I agree, it's a personal preference thing, though, so it would be good > for users to be able to choose for themselves whether they want this. > > I get around it by subscribing to the list with a different email to > that which I post from, since I'm pretty much the only person on the > list who likes to see the echoes. Doesn't that mean you'll need to unset "subonlypost"? Imho, "subonlypost" is a kinda efficient mechanism against spam mails. > A special version of the list is an interesting thought. That might be a > way to quickly offer that functionality before we get more per-user > options/data supported. Though perhaps it's better to wait for more > per-user options to do this, which is what I was intending. Yes, if that was implemented, it should be a per-user setting.