From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Iles Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: S5P: Add s5p_timer support for HRT Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:49:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20110310094941.GA3289@pulham.picochip.com> References: <1299636813-4869-1-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com> <1299636813-4869-2-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com> <20110309141016.GB2737@pulham.picochip.com> <002d01cbdede$65e19660$31a4c320$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:57211 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752707Ab1CJJtq (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 04:49:46 -0500 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so1734386wwa.1 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:49:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002d01cbdede$65e19660$31a4c320$@com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Sangbeom Kim Cc: 'Jamie Iles' , kgene.kim@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:48:22PM +0900, Sangbeom Kim wrote: > And Do you mean that Is needed error handling of clk_enable like > below? > > clk_enable(timerclk); > > if (IS_ERR(timerclk)){ > clk_put(timerclk) > panic("failed to enable timers clock"); > } No, clk_enable() returns negative errno on failure, so something like. if (clk_enable(timerclk)) panic("failed to enable timerclk"); > There is no another clk_enable for timerclk. I didn't mean for just timerclk, there are several other clk_enable()'s for other clks. Jamie From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamie@jamieiles.com (Jamie Iles) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:49:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: S5P: Add s5p_timer support for HRT In-Reply-To: <002d01cbdede$65e19660$31a4c320$@com> References: <1299636813-4869-1-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com> <1299636813-4869-2-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com> <20110309141016.GB2737@pulham.picochip.com> <002d01cbdede$65e19660$31a4c320$@com> Message-ID: <20110310094941.GA3289@pulham.picochip.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:48:22PM +0900, Sangbeom Kim wrote: > And Do you mean that Is needed error handling of clk_enable like > below? > > clk_enable(timerclk); > > if (IS_ERR(timerclk)){ > clk_put(timerclk) > panic("failed to enable timers clock"); > } No, clk_enable() returns negative errno on failure, so something like. if (clk_enable(timerclk)) panic("failed to enable timerclk"); > There is no another clk_enable for timerclk. I didn't mean for just timerclk, there are several other clk_enable()'s for other clks. Jamie