From: Arno Wagner <arno@wagner.name>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Question on Disk Layout (Stacking supported ?)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:57:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110310185738.GA3908@tansi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DA0E1B0401643E4E9750810C61C8697F0496AE2B@ISS-EXM1005.deutschepost.dpwn.com>
Don't know about your particlar setup, but I have several
RAID1 (including two 3-way and one with an SSD) below
dm-crypt. Works pretty well.
The main question I see is what you want with the encrypton.
Of course, you can blanket encrypt everything, wich seems
to be what you want, except for /boot. Personally, I
want it the other way round, but I have not allways
all encrypted devices mapped and different passphrases
for them.
Arno
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:06:31PM +0100, Robert.Heinzmann@deutschepost.de wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a more general question regarding dm_crypt.
>
> Q: What is the best way to incorporate dm_crypt in a production ready device stack ?
>
> Summing I have multipathing (optional) and I want flexible storage management with pvresize, multiple filesystems and everything (e.g. in "the clouds") LVM is the way to go. So my ideal (and working) setup would look like this:
>
> Filesystem: [ /boot ] [ / ] [ /var ]
> LVM [ ] [ lv1 ] [ lv2 ]
> LVM [ ] [ vg (RootVG) ]
> LVM [ ] [ pv ]
> Crypt: [ ] [ DM_CRYPT ]
> Partition: [ part1 - (boot) ] [ part2 ]
> SCSI: [ Block Device ]
> DMMP: [ Path1 ][ Path2 ] (Optional Layer)
> Disk: [ LUN ]
>
> Do you see any problems (from the dm_crypt side) with this setup in terms of deadlocks, or unsupported stacking or is this a "supposed to work" configuration ?
>
> I know that device mapper always causes performance penalty because of missing barrier support (earlier Kernels) and I/O splitting in 4k units, however I have a BBU, so not a problem really and performance penalty is allowed.
>
> I have seen that the split to 4k causes latency to increase dramatically, however this seems to be a "minor" issue also (altought no solution so far).
>
> Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Kind Regards
> Robert Heinzmann
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt@saout.de
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
>
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 18:06 [dm-crypt] Question on Disk Layout (Stacking supported ?) Robert.Heinzmann
2011-03-10 18:57 ` Arno Wagner [this message]
2011-03-10 19:09 ` Milan Broz
2011-03-11 8:34 ` Robert.Heinzmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110310185738.GA3908@tansi.org \
--to=arno@wagner.name \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.