From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Re: Features scheduled for the 2.6.39 merge window Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:24:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20110311142421.GB4880@dumpdata.com> References: <1198043929.20110311115713@eikelenboom.it> <1299841419.17339.1944.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <288478695.20110311123403@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <288478695.20110311123403@eikelenboom.it> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Sander Eikelenboom Cc: Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > Hello Ian, > > Friday, March 11, 2011, 12:03:39 PM, you wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 10:57 +0000, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have lost a bit of track on what (backend) features are scheduled for the 2.6.39 merge window. > > > Konrad posted a state of the world for this last night, see the thread > > "2.6.39 merge window (git pulls and what is planned to go in)" > > >> Of special interest for me: > > > I'm afraid you are rather out of luck in that respect :-( > > >> - blkback (tapdisk2?) > > > Not planned for 2.6.39. > > >> - netback > > > Under review on the netdev list, might still make it. > > >> - pciback > > > Not planned for 2.6.39. > > > FWIW blkback, netback and pciback all have relatively clean branches > > which could be pulled in for testing purposes though. > > Hmmm looking at Konrad's git tree, the master tree seems to be just that in this case :-) > Will try it later this weekend. Yeah, except that it does not work right now with legacy IRQ (like USB devices) passthrough - just found out about that yesterday when I started running it through the paces. But it works fine for PV, HVM, and Dom 0 case.