From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip:x86/mm 2/3] x86: Use this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt current cpu
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:50:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110312115046.GD2005@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110312115010.GC2005@htj.dyndns.org>
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
It is more effective to use a segment prefix instead of calculating the
address of the current cpu area amd then testing flags.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: work/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ work/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -355,7 +355,6 @@ static void notify_thresholds(__u64 msr_
static void intel_thermal_interrupt(void)
{
__u64 msr_val;
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(smp_processor_id());
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
@@ -367,19 +366,19 @@ static void intel_thermal_interrupt(void
CORE_LEVEL) != 0)
mce_log_therm_throt_event(CORE_THROTTLED | msr_val);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PLN))
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PLN))
if (therm_throt_process(msr_val & THERM_STATUS_POWER_LIMIT,
POWER_LIMIT_EVENT,
CORE_LEVEL) != 0)
mce_log_therm_throt_event(CORE_POWER_LIMIT | msr_val);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS)) {
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTS)) {
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS, msr_val);
if (therm_throt_process(msr_val & PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS_PROCHOT,
THERMAL_THROTTLING_EVENT,
PACKAGE_LEVEL) != 0)
mce_log_therm_throt_event(PACKAGE_THROTTLED | msr_val);
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PLN))
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PLN))
if (therm_throt_process(msr_val &
PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS_POWER_LIMIT,
POWER_LIMIT_EVENT,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-12 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-12 11:50 [PATCH tip:x86/mm 1/3] x86: A fast way to check capabilities of the current cpu Tejun Heo
2011-03-12 11:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-03-12 11:51 ` [PATCH tip:x86/mm 3/3] acpi throttling: Use this_cpu_has and simplify code " Tejun Heo
2011-03-28 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 14:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-03-30 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-14 19:49 ` [PATCH tip:x86/mm 1/3] x86: A fast way to check capabilities of the " Andi Kleen
2011-03-30 15:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-03-30 16:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-30 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-03-30 16:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110312115046.GD2005@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.