From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Samuel Subject: Re: btrfs fi df returns nothing Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:24:50 +1100 Message-ID: <201103131824.54506.chris@csamuel.org> References: <20110309114746.GA2998@carfax.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2116071.fEUA6k8bD4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110309114746.GA2998@carfax.org.uk> List-ID: --nextPart2116071.fEUA6k8bD4 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:47:46 PM Hugo Mills wrote: [Ubuntu 10.04 LTS kernel - 2.6.32 based] > Ouch. That's a very early kernel, in btrfs terms. That may be true, but as someone who's been running btrfs as /home on laptop SSD's for over 2 years now the reports from people using later kernels worried me enough to not go past 10.04 on it. However, the impression I'm getting now is that 2.6.38 is looking a lot more solid for btrfs than recent kernels and so I'm looking forward to testing that out when 11.04 comes out! cheers, Chris =2D-=20 Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. =46or more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --nextPart2116071.fEUA6k8bD4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUATXxxQ41yjaOTJg85AQJD/Af/fyOJqVh5qj7ZQ0cpkkzmUazzTVUZ05G2 GvVYhg9jG2knYJ82+TiF4S+/DRQoEbgkXnMhJur1aCUzV+tRO4ntr7NPoBmJOn3G 5RViOgSNKNT06RTBdqZMdP3/rji9zApaYsDB7PTzeeVlC/mGZeGnGkaW6J1kXg8h F0kPmgtRmK5khdK51PxzpcjJzDFhLmbnMoYX7iNtWIkjSbzysjFHb9j4+m573Q3w 4x7cniUnT+uYLCU8sY5yFVbVCJSchEjAkLYC4nWAsDsCDnJOmDW7X7mtjew0ELlM gUB3XhXfIwvlYQIQFeROBg3QYbSmdp4Jx86oRAVzAP3T6ZXGSFxuGw== =lcK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2116071.fEUA6k8bD4--