From: "Loïc Minier" <lool@dooz.org>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] armv7: enable Thumb build for armv7
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:54:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110315115447.GE3819@bee.dooz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7EE491.8030304@ti.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011, Aneesh V wrote:
> Please note that I am enabling armv7-a in the second patch in omap4
> config.mk file. The reason I didn't do this here was some ARMv7 SoCs do
> not want to use -march=armv7-a even if the compiler supports it. Tegra2
> is an example. Please see the below from Tegra2 config.mk:
>
> # Use ARMv4 for Tegra2 - initial code runs on the AVP, which is an ARM7TDI.
> PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -march=armv4
Good point, I wonder whether it would make sense to have
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk default to -march=armv7 and Tegra2 to
override this with -march=armv4. Maybe this code doesn't belong under
armv7 though; or perhaps -march=armv4 should only be set when building
a subset of the files rather than by default.
> This being the case I would have had to define another CONFIG flag if I
> had to add -march=armv7-a in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk. I thought it
> un-necessary and instead put it in the SoC specific file. So, Tegra2
> can continue to use -march=armv4 and will get Thumb-1 if they enable
> CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD. Or do you think we should define something like
> CONFIG_SYS_MARCH_ARMV7
Up to you, but I would expect that code udner arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ would
build with -march=armv7 (maybe not -a though), with specific overrides
where that's not the case; it would feel a bit odd to me to have this
as a "config" option.
--
Lo?c Minier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 13:27 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] armv7: enable Thumb build for armv7 Aneesh V
2011-03-14 13:27 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] OMAP4: enable Thumb2 support for OMAP4 Aneesh V
2011-03-14 16:11 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] armv7: enable Thumb build for armv7 Loïc Minier
2011-03-15 4:01 ` Aneesh V
2011-03-15 11:54 ` Loïc Minier [this message]
2011-03-16 8:39 ` Aneesh V
2011-03-16 17:25 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-03-17 7:30 ` Aneesh V
2011-03-24 14:45 ` Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110315115447.GE3819@bee.dooz.org \
--to=lool@dooz.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.