From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754270Ab1CREyK (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:54:10 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:45245 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753202Ab1CREyG (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:54:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:54:01 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: andy.green@linaro.org Cc: Greg KH , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Mark Brown , Nicolas Pitre , Linux USB list , lkml Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets Message-ID: <20110318045401.GA18545@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <20110311165642.GA9996@kroah.com> <20110317214042.GQ31411@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110317214736.GA29014@kroah.com> <201103172333.01474.arnd@arndb.de> <20110317225328.GB31581@kroah.com> <4D8296D1.9060106@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D8296D1.9060106@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:18:41PM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > On 03/17/2011 10:53 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > >>Not tested! > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > > >Very nice. > > > >Andy and Mark, would this patch work for you? > > You do realize this untested patch depends on 13 year old vapour > definition of general usb device tagging in Device Tree that does > not exist yet? IIRC, not vapour. I believe this binding is currently used by Open Firmware on existing PowerPC, SPARC and x86 machines. Linux doesn't use the binding because up to this point Linux hasn't cared about how firmware initialized the usb bus. It just reinitializes everything anyway. g. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:54:01 -0600 Message-ID: <20110318045401.GA18545@angua.secretlab.ca> References: <20110311165642.GA9996@kroah.com> <20110317214042.GQ31411@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110317214736.GA29014@kroah.com> <201103172333.01474.arnd@arndb.de> <20110317225328.GB31581@kroah.com> <4D8296D1.9060106@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D8296D1.9060106-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Linux USB list , Greg KH , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Mark Brown , lkml List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:18:41PM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > On 03/17/2011 10:53 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > >>Not tested! > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > > >Very nice. > > > >Andy and Mark, would this patch work for you? > > You do realize this untested patch depends on 13 year old vapour > definition of general usb device tagging in Device Tree that does > not exist yet? IIRC, not vapour. I believe this binding is currently used by Open Firmware on existing PowerPC, SPARC and x86 machines. Linux doesn't use the binding because up to this point Linux hasn't cared about how firmware initialized the usb bus. It just reinitializes everything anyway. g.