From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tommi Virtanen Subject: Re: Autotest results from 2011-03-22 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:17:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20110322181745.GC8083@dreamer> References: <20110322172419.GB8083@dreamer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.hq.newdream.net ([66.33.206.127]:57623 "EHLO mail.hq.newdream.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752489Ab1CVSRr (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:17:47 -0400 Received: from dreamer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hq.newdream.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2648C2C173 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110322172419.GB8083@dreamer> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org And here are the results of the re-reruns: * autotest summary 2011-03-22 #2 ** ceph_tiobench (job 265) SUCCESS captures performance info but does not analyze it http://autotest.ceph.newdream.net/results/265-tv/group0/sepia78.ceph.dreamhost.com/tiobench/results/raw_output_1 ** ceph_direct_io_test (job 266) exact same symptoms as with earlier run it seems direct_io_test hoses a ceph installation bad enough that exec segfaults reliably http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/915 earlier ceph_bonnie hang (job 263) might be the same bug -- :(){ :|:&};: