From: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: [patch 11/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:03:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323030449.732563642@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110323030326.789836913@google.com
[-- Attachment #1: sched-bwc-account_nr_running.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7249 bytes --]
With task entities participating in throttled sub-trees it is possible for
task activation/de-activation to not lead to root visible changes to
rq->nr_running. This in turn leads to incorrect idle and weight-per-task load
balance decisions.
To allow correct accounting we move responsibility for updating rq->nr_running
to the respective sched::classes. In the fair-group case this update is
hierarchical, tracking the number of active tasks rooted at each group entity.
This also allows us to fix a small buglet in pick_next_task() when group
scheduling is enabled.
Note: technically this issue also exists with the existing sched_rt
throttling; however due to the nearly complete provisioning of system
resources for rt scheduling this is much less common by default.
Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
---
kernel/sched.c | 6 +----
kernel/sched_fair.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/sched_rt.c | 5 +++-
kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 2 +
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct task_group root_task_group;
/* CFS-related fields in a runqueue */
struct cfs_rq {
struct load_weight load;
- unsigned long nr_running;
+ unsigned long nr_running, h_nr_running;
u64 exec_clock;
u64 min_vruntime;
@@ -1914,7 +1914,6 @@ static void activate_task(struct rq *rq,
rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
- inc_nr_running(rq);
}
/*
@@ -1926,7 +1925,6 @@ static void deactivate_task(struct rq *r
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
- dec_nr_running(rq);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
@@ -4174,7 +4172,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq)
* Optimization: we know that if all tasks are in
* the fair class we can call that function directly:
*/
- if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.nr_running)) {
+ if (likely(rq->nr_running == rq->cfs.h_nr_running)) {
p = fair_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq);
if (likely(p))
return p;
Index: tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1404,9 +1404,11 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_
static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
struct sched_entity *se;
+ long task_delta, dequeue = 1;
- se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
+ se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
/* account load preceding throttle */
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -1414,17 +1416,24 @@ static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_r
(void*)(long)rq_of(cfs_rq)->cpu);
rcu_read_unlock();
+ task_delta = -cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
/* throttled entity or throttle-on-deactivate */
if (!se->on_rq)
break;
- dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
+ if (dequeue)
+ dequeue_entity(qcfs_rq, se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
+ qcfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
+
if (qcfs_rq->load.weight)
- break;
+ dequeue = 0;
}
+ if (!se)
+ rq->nr_running += task_delta;
+
cfs_rq->throttled = 1;
cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp = rq_of(cfs_rq)->clock;
}
@@ -1435,7 +1444,7 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs
struct sched_entity *se;
struct tg_unthrottle_down_data udd;
struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
-
+ int task_delta, enqueue = 1;
se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
update_rq_clock(rq);
@@ -1454,16 +1463,22 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs
if (!cfs_rq->load.weight)
return;
+ task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
if (se->on_rq)
- break;
+ enqueue = 0;
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
- enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
+ if (enqueue)
+ enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta;
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
break;
}
+ if (!se)
+ rq->nr_running += task_delta;
+
/* determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle cpu */
if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->cfs.nr_running)
resched_task(rq->curr);
@@ -1637,7 +1652,7 @@ static inline void hrtick_update(struct
static void
enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = NULL;
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
@@ -1645,6 +1660,7 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
break;
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
/* end evaluation on throttled cfs_rq */
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) {
se = NULL;
@@ -1655,12 +1671,19 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
}
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running++;
+
+ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ break;
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
}
+ if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
+
hrtick_update(rq);
}
@@ -1671,12 +1694,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
*/
static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = NULL;
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se, flags);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running--;
/* end evaluation on throttled cfs_rq */
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) {
se = NULL;
@@ -1692,12 +1716,19 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq
}
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ cfs_rq->h_nr_running--;
+
+ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ break;
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq);
}
+ if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
+
hrtick_update(rq);
}
Index: tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -910,6 +910,8 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct ta
if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
}
static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
@@ -920,6 +922,8 @@ static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *r
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
}
/*
@@ -1787,4 +1791,3 @@ static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_fi
rcu_read_unlock();
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
-
Index: tip/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -35,11 +35,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
static void
enqueue_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
+ inc_nr_running(rq);
}
static void
dequeue_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
+ dec_nr_running(rq);
}
static void yield_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 3:03 [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V5 Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 01/15] sched: introduce primitives to account for CFS bandwidth tracking Paul Turner
2011-03-24 12:38 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 02/15] sched: validate CFS quota hierarchies Paul Turner
2011-03-23 10:39 ` torbenh
2011-03-23 20:49 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:31 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-04-08 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 6:57 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-04-04 23:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 03/15] sched: accumulate per-cfs_rq cpu usage Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 20:44 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 20:47 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 04/15] sched: throttle cfs_rq entities which exceed their local quota Paul Turner
2011-03-23 5:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-23 20:53 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:36 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-24 7:40 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 23:15 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 05/15] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota at period refresh Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 06/15] sched: allow for positional tg_tree walks Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 07/15] sched: prevent interactions between throttled entities and load-balance Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 08/15] sched: migrate throttled tasks on HOTPLUG Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 2:31 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 09/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidth control statistics Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 10/15] sched: (fixlet) dont update shares twice on on_rq parent Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` Paul Turner [this message]
2011-04-05 13:28 ` [patch 11/15] sched: hierarchical task accounting for SCHED_OTHER Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 12/15] sched: maintain throttled rqs as a list Paul Turner
2011-04-22 2:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-04-24 21:23 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 13/15] sched: expire slack quota using generation counters Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 7:22 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-06 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 14/15] sched: return unused quota on voluntary sleep Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 2:25 ` Paul Turner
2011-03-23 3:03 ` [patch 15/15] sched: add documentation for bandwidth control Paul Turner
2011-03-24 6:38 ` Bharata B Rao
2011-03-24 16:12 ` [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V5 Bharata B Rao
2011-03-31 7:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-04-04 23:10 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-05 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 2:12 ` Test for CFS Bandwidth Control V6 Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-24 0:53 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2011-05-24 7:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-08 2:54 ` Paul Turner
2011-06-08 5:55 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323030449.732563642@google.com \
--to=pjt@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.