From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932550Ab1CWNyS (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:54:18 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35133 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932467Ab1CWNyQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:54:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:51:26 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Weil, Oren jer" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alan@linux.intel.com" , "david@woodhou.se" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] char/mei: Intel MEI Driver Message-ID: <20110323135126.GB16769@suse.de> References: <1300791092-14319-1-git-send-email-oren.jer.weil@intel.com> <201103221750.52118.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:20:20AM +0200, Weil, Oren jer wrote: > >I suppose one of the important things to do here is integrate the watchdog > >part into the common watchdog infrastructure in drivers/watchdog. Maybe > >this driver can export a simple interface to another module that implements > >the watchdog device? > > Yes, this is one the ideas the Alan suggested, > we are thinking about this direction in the future. What's keeping you from doing this now? thanks, greg k-h