From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, vda.linux@googlemail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu, roland@hack.frob.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Improve ptrace and job control interaction
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:38:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323183837.GA27680@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300874766-12941-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 03/23, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> All patches have been reviewed and acked by Oleg and this will be the
> last repost of these patches. They're being committed to a stable git
> tree (will eventually be managed by Oleg) and will be pulled into
> linux-next once -rc1 is released.
Thanks Tejun. The whole series is fine imho.
But of course we need more changes. In particular, there is still the
small problem with the CLD_CONTINUED notification.
__ptrace_unlink() does signal_wake_up() if it adds SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED.
This is correct, but it should also add TIF_SIGPENDING if
(signal->flags & SIGNAL_CLD_MASK) != 0.
Otherwise, if the stopped tracee was PTRACE_CONT'ed and then SIGCONT
ends the group-stop, the real_parent won't be notified after detach.
Unfortunately, this means that recalc_sigpending_tsk() has to check
SIGNAL_CLD_MASK as well. Do you see another solution?
There is another case. SIGCONT can hit the stopped-but-running-task,
but I don't think we should try to set TIF_SIGPENDING in this case,
you are going to add the trap later.
There is another case. SIGCONT can hit the stopped-but-running-task,
but I don't think we should try to set TIF_SIGPENDING in this case,
you are going to add the trap later.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 10:05 [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Improve ptrace and job control interaction Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 01/20] signal: Fix SIGCONT notification code Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 02/20] ptrace: Remove the extra wake_up_state() from ptrace_detach() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 03/20] signal: Remove superflous try_to_freeze() loop in do_signal_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 04/20] ptrace: Kill tracehook_notify_jctl() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 05/20] ptrace: Add @why to ptrace_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 06/20] signal: Fix premature completion of group stop when interfered by ptrace Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 07/20] signal: Use GROUP_STOP_PENDING to stop once for a single group stop Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 08/20] ptrace: Participate in group stop from ptrace_stop() iff the task is trapping for " Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 09/20] ptrace: Make do_signal_stop() use ptrace_stop() if the task is being ptraced Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 10/20] ptrace: Clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 11/20] ptrace: Collapse ptrace_untrace() into __ptrace_unlink() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 12/20] ptrace: Always put ptracee into appropriate execution state Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:05 ` [PATCH 13/20] job control: Don't set group_stop exit_code if re-entering job control stop Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 14/20] job control: Small reorganization of wait_consider_task() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 15/20] job control: Fix ptracer wait(2) hang and explain notask_error clearing Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 16/20] job control: Allow access to job control events through ptracees Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 17/20] job control: Add @for_ptrace to do_notify_parent_cldstop() Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 18/20] job control: Job control stop notifications should always go to the real parent Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 19/20] job control: Notify the real parent of job control events regardless of ptrace Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 10:06 ` [PATCH 20/20] job control: Don't send duplicate job control stop notification while ptraced Tejun Heo
2011-03-23 18:38 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-03-25 14:26 ` [PATCHSET] ptrace,signal: Improve ptrace and job control interaction Tejun Heo
2011-03-26 18:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 8:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-28 12:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 15:21 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110323183837.GA27680@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.