All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Giorgio <mywing81@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux@brodo.de" <linux@brodo.de>,
	"dougthompson@xmission.com" <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
	"mchehab@redhat.com" <mchehab@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Machine Check Exception and cpufreq
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:23:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323192338.GE22652@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikDqUptK8XdPpAGYKFskSL7ugfoh-VjNzyXU_3q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:02:01PM -0400, Giorgio wrote:
> 2011/3/22 Giorgio <mywing81@gmail.com>:
> > 2011/3/22 Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>:
> >> this is very interesting. Question: is it possible to retest with
> >> a newer kernel from upstream (say 2.6.38) to see whether the issue
> >> persists? I'd like to rule out the possibility that powernow-k8 is
> >> not causing any trouble which has been fixed in newer kernels in the
> >> meantime.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >
> > Hello Borislav,
> >
> > thanks for your quick reply. Yes, I only tested it with the stock
> > 2.6.32 kernel shipped with Ubuntu 10.04, but I will download the
> > latest stable kernel from kernel.org (2.6.38) and test again. I'll
> > come back to you in the following days. Regards,
> 
> Borislav,
> 
> I tested again with 2.6.38 kernel: the system was stressed for several
> hours with various activities (compiling, copying data back and forth
> from two hard drives, encoding/decoding video streams, etc) but I was
> not able to reproduce the problem, so I guess it has been fixed.
> If you're interested here's the info I collected with 2.6.38:
> 
> http://mywing.altervista.org/tmp/info-2.6.38.log

Great. It's either fixed or latest powernow-k8 changes timings so as not
to trigger it anymore, because your issue looks like the chipset could
by doing something fishy with CRC during Pstate transitions.

If it happens again, try whether upgrading your BIOS solves it (although
I'm pretty sceptical about getting newer BIOS for such an old board :-) ).

> I found a similar report on the web, I don't know if this could be related:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01922.html

Nah, that's another issue.

Thanks for testing!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-23 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-22 11:27 Machine Check Exception and cpufreq Giorgio
2011-03-22 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-22 18:10   ` Giorgio
2011-03-23 19:02     ` Giorgio
2011-03-23 19:23       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-03-23 19:48         ` Giorgio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110323192338.GE22652@aftab \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=mywing81@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.