From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederick van der Wyck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Platform: Samsung Q10 backlight driver Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:14:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20110328221413.GA7620@ntl> References: <20110221223743.GA8548@lat.lan> <20110222052709.GA11681@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20110222212703.GA7292@lat.lan> <20110311174329.GI16652@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:40680 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753979Ab1C1WN6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:13:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110311174329.GI16652@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matthew Garrett Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Matthew, On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 05:43:29PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Hm. This patch makes both git-am and patch very unhappy, in that they > fail to create samsung-q10.c despite it not already existing. How did > you generate it? Did you get the chance to try applying the new copy of the Samsung Q10 patch I sent in response to your message above? I guess you're waiting to do it along with the next round of patches, but please let me know if you tried and it still caused problems, so I can fix it for next time. Thanks, Frederick