[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] pseries: Abolish envs array

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 10:05:12AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05.04.2011, at 07:12, David Gibson wrote:
[snip]
> > +struct icp_state *xics_system_init(int nr_irqs)
> > {
> > +    CPUState *env;
> > +    int max_server_num;
> >     int i;
> >     struct icp_state *icp;
> >     struct ics_state *ics;
> > 
> > +    max_server_num = -1;
> > +    for (env = first_cpu; env != NULL; env = env->next_cpu) {
> > +        if (env->cpu_index > max_server_num) {
> > +            max_server_num = env->cpu_index;
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> >     icp = qemu_mallocz(sizeof(*icp));
> > -    icp->nr_servers = nr_servers;
> > -    icp->ss = qemu_mallocz(nr_servers * sizeof(struct icp_server_state));
> > +    icp->nr_servers = max_server_num + 1;
> > +    icp->ss = qemu_mallocz(icp->nr_servers*sizeof(struct icp_server_state));
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < icp->nr_servers; i++) {
> > +        icp->ss[i].mfrr = 0xff;
> 
> Is ss always big enough to hold all CPUs + 1?

Well, it should be.  We allocated it just above based on
icp->nr_servers, and nr_servers is the largest cpu_index + 1, computer
just above that.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson