From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:58:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v4] hwmon: Add support for MAX6642 Message-Id: <20110406185824.GA26734@ericsson.com> List-Id: References: <4D9CB118.80103@appeartv.com> In-Reply-To: <4D9CB118.80103@appeartv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Per, On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:29:44PM -0400, Per Dal=E9n wrote: > First a big thanks to Guenter Roeck for helping me (allot) to cleanup > this driver >=20 > v3 -> v4: > * Removed "data->valid =3D 0;" (missed that in v3 ;) > * only read the limits once > * changed the temp_input and temp_high as suggested by Guenter, also > changed the functions/macros related to that change > MAX6642 is a SMBus-Compatible Remote/Local Temperature Sensor with Overte= mperature Alarm from Maxim. > =20 > Signed-off-by: Per Dalen >=20 Sorry, one more detail I just noticed. More of a question. [ ... ] > + > +static struct max6642_data *max6642_update_device(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct i2c_client *client =3D to_i2c_client(dev); > + struct max6642_data *data =3D i2c_get_clientdata(client); > + u16 val, tmp; > + > + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock); > + > + if (time_after(jiffies, data->last_updated + HZ * 8) || !data->valid) { Are you sure you only want to update readings every 8 seconds ? Also, after spending all this time on this driver (and after falling into the same trap last night with another driver ;), it looks like this is real= ly just another variant of the lm90, and adding support for max6642 to the lm90 driver might be quite trivial. Have you considered this ? Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors