From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 8/9] perf: Change close() semantics for group events
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:17:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110409192142.038377551@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110409191739.813727025@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: perf-remove-on-close.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1507 bytes --]
In order to always call list_del_event() on the correct cpu if the
event is part of an active context and avoid having to do two IPIs,
change the close() semantics slightly.
The current perf_event_disable() call would disable a whole group if
the event that's being closed is the group leader, whereas the new
code keeps the group siblings enabled.
People should not rely on this behaviour and I don't think they do,
but in case we find they do, the fix is easy and we have to take the
double IPI cost.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -2920,12 +2920,6 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
- /*
- * Remove from the PMU, can't get re-enabled since we got
- * here because the last ref went.
- */
- perf_event_disable(event);
-
WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
/*
* There are two ways this annotation is useful:
@@ -2942,8 +2936,8 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
mutex_lock_nested(&ctx->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
perf_group_detach(event);
- list_del_event(event, ctx);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ perf_remove_from_context(event);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
free_event(event);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-09 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-09 19:17 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] perf: Rework event scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] perf: Optimize ctx_sched_out Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:38 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Optimize ctx_sched_out() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] perf: Clean up ctx reference counting Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-11 6:05 ` Lin Ming
2011-04-11 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:39 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Clean up 'ctx' " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] perf: Change event scheduling locking Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:39 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Optimize " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] perf: Remove task_ctx_sched_in Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:39 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Remove task_ctx_sched_in() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] perf: Simplify and fix __perf_install_in_context Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-10 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-11 8:44 ` Lin Ming
2011-04-11 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-11 8:12 ` Lin Ming
2011-05-28 16:40 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Simplify and fix __perf_install_in_context() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] perf: Change ctx::is_active semantics Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:40 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Change and simplify " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] perf: Collect the schedule in rules in one function Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:41 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Collect the schedule-in " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-28 16:41 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Change close() semantics for group events tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-09 19:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] perf: De-schedule a task context when removing the last event Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-28 16:42 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110409192142.038377551@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.