From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: sdhci: add error checking for mmc_add_host Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 06:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20110411044022.GD20437@pengutronix.de> References: <4DA2633C.5000103@samsung.com> <20110411030453.GA20437@pengutronix.de> <4DA28098.9020202@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:50013 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750985Ab1DKEkY (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:40:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DA28098.9020202@samsung.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Chris Ball , Kyungmin Park --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I just think good that remove the host...(any crash didn't occur). > there is not special reason. Look at the mmc-core code, please (host.c). Compare what remove_host does a= nd what add_host does before it fails. What do you think? Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2ihjYACgkQD27XaX1/VRticACgyecllHDOcM8tmWw8S531R9Uu /JwAoIt+VcwxnVczlRgkdGolIYqGPPa7 =cV80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc--