All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>,
	"Xu, Andiry" <Andiry.Xu@amd.com>,
	USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] USB host: Fix lockdep warning in AMD PLL quirk
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:16:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411161647.GK23633@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1104111144540.1975-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:49:30AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:26:00AM -0400, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > You mean 2.6.39-rc2 right? I'm asking because I hit the same warning
> > > with 39-rc2 now too but it didn't appear with .38 - so it has to have
> > > snuck in after the merge window. If so, you don't need the stable tag.
> > 
> > You were right, just tested plain 2.6.38 and it doesn't happen. So I
> > removed the stable tag. Here is the updated patch.
> 
> ...
> 
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > @@ -84,65 +84,92 @@ int usb_amd_find_chipset_info(void)
> >  {
> 
> ...
> 
> > +commit:
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&amd_lock, flags);
> > +	if (amd_chipset.probe_count > 0) {
> > +		/* race - someone else was faster - drop devices */
> > +
> > +		/* Mark that we where here */
> > +		amd_chipset.probe_count++;
> 
> This line should be moved above the "if" statement, since you always 
> want to increment the count.

No, probe_count can't be incremented here because the probe is not
finished yet. If another thread jumps in after the lock is released and
detects probe_count > 0 while the probe hasn't happened the quirk will
fail. So we need to make sure that amd_chipset.probe_count does not
become > 0 before the probe is finished.

> 
> > +		ret = amd_chipset.probe_result;
> > +
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +		if (info.nb_dev)
> > +			pci_dev_put(info.nb_dev);
> > +		if (info.smbus_dev)
> > +			pci_dev_put(info.smbus_dev);
> > +
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* no race - commit the result */
> > +		info.probe_count++;
> 
> This isn't right, because info.probe_count was initialized to 0.  Maybe 
> amd_chipset.probe_count should be made into a separate variable, not a 
> part of the structure, like amd_lock.

The purpose of the struct is structuring of data. In theory all of its
members could be turned into global variables. The amd_lock is different
because it does not only protect the struct but also access to the
hardware while the quirk is applied/unapplied.


	Joerg

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-11 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-06 11:21 [PATCH] USB host: Fix lockdep warning in AMD PLL quirk Joerg Roedel
2011-04-06 15:16 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-06 15:25   ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07  2:21   ` Xu, Andiry
2011-04-07  7:50   ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07  9:01     ` Xu, Andiry
2011-04-07 13:00       ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07 15:01         ` Alan Stern
2011-04-07 20:22           ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-08 14:26             ` [PATCH v4] " Joerg Roedel
2011-04-08 14:52               ` Alan Stern
2011-04-08 15:09                 ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-08 16:30                   ` Alan Stern
2011-04-07  8:26   ` [PATCH] " Joerg Roedel
2011-04-07  9:58     ` Xu, Andiry
2011-04-07 12:52       ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-07 13:14       ` Joerg Roedel
2011-04-11  6:26         ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-11  6:43           ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-11  6:59           ` [PATCH v5] " Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-11 10:00             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-04-11 15:49             ` Alan Stern
2011-04-11 16:16               ` Roedel, Joerg [this message]
2011-04-11 16:25                 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-11 16:37                   ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-11 17:05                     ` Alan Stern
2011-04-12  6:41                       ` [PATCH v6] " Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-12 10:59                         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-04-12 11:13                           ` Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-13  6:38                           ` [PATCH v7] " Roedel, Joerg
2011-04-13 14:44                             ` Alan Stern
2011-04-07 14:35     ` [PATCH] " Alan Stern
2011-04-07 15:00       ` Roedel, Joerg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110411161647.GK23633@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=Andiry.Xu@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.