From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stoexhubfe01.domain01.net ([83.145.59.140]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9LCC-0002r8-4B for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:46:42 +0200 Received: from localhost (85.231.30.150) by stoexhubfe01.domain01.net (10.12.10.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:44:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:44:15 +0200 From: Anders Darander To: Message-ID: <20110411174403.GA3719@chargestorm.se> Mail-Followup-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1302456441-3417-1-git-send-email-anders@chargestorm.se> <20110411080125.GB28101@jama.jama.net> <1217FED4-A7EC-4603-9CD7-19BEA0827E96@chargestorm.se> <20110411105712.GA5626@excalibur.local> <20110411114116.GB5626@excalibur.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110411114116.GB5626@excalibur.local> X-Accept-Language: sv, en, de X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5AF0 B2E9 78FE 9D75 D110 6F8F 3E31 84D7 920E 938C X-GPG-Key-Id: 0x920E938C X-GPG-Keyserver: hkp://keys.gnupg.net Organization: ChargeStorm AB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-GFI-SMTP-Submission: 1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lowpan-tools_0.2.2; : fix build with static libnl1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:46:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Hi, A third version has just been posted. * Stefan Schmidt [110411 13:41]: > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:29, Anders Darander wrote: > > Yes, I agree with you that the correct fix is to update lowpan-tools > > to use libnl2. However, due to time constraints, we opted for the > > interim solution. > Yup, no problem. I'm going to touch the ieee802154 kernel stack and > maybe lowpan-tools the next weeks anyway I will try to squeeze in the > change to libnl2. Good news, such a change will definitely be appreciated. We had the same idea, however, we won't be able to find the time for it for quite a while... Regarding your work touching the ieee802154 kernel stack, is the version from the linux-zigbee-kernel tree? Or is it something getting mainlined? We are currently in a prototype phase, especially when it comes to zigbee, and both kernel version and additional kernel patches are open... Regards, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB