From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tommi Virtanen Subject: Re: Fw: re-exporting nfs Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:50:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20110411175000.GA2099@dreamer> References: <19ABB379BFC8469C8A53FD5B3E4BD875@PC201010310710> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.hq.newdream.net ([66.33.206.127]:42487 "EHLO mail.hq.newdream.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754845Ab1DKRuA (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:50:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19ABB379BFC8469C8A53FD5B3E4BD875@PC201010310710> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuki Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 02:45:19PM +0800, Yuki wrote: > I was confused by two things during the test on nfs. > 1. The "dd" command will call mknod to create a file,but mknod will > creates a FIFO, character special file, or block special file with > the specified name.(It will call lookup_open to create a file during > the test on ceph,) This is pretty much out of topic for Ceph, but I figured I'd just clarify this: an mknod(2) call with mode specifying S_IFREG creates regular files. -- :(){ :|:&};: