From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:43:48 +0200 From: Richard Cochran Message-ID: <20110412054348.GA2973@domain.hid> References: <20110409184122.GA11908@domain.hid> <20110409185503.GB11908@domain.hid> <4DA0B580.4070602@domain.hid> <4DA0B878.9010106@domain.hid> <20110410065250.GA28869@domain.hid> <4DA17996.3010103@domain.hid> <20110411171437.GA3715@domain.hid> <4DA37209.4000503@domain.hid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DA37209.4000503@domain.hid> Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] arm ixp: more trouble with recent xenomai List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:26:33PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Wait a minute. You are comparing results obtained after 2 or 3, or 10 > minutes of runtime? I am not sure such results are meaningful. I do my > benchmarks with the noltp_hell test: > http://git.xenomai.org/?p=mkrootfs.git;a=blob_plain;f=tests/noltp_hell;hb=HEAD Of course, the longer the test, the more confidence you have. But, when tracking down kernel freezes and toggling two component versions and a half dozen CONFIG options, sometimes you do short tests just to "sample" the combination. I will follow these up with overnight tests, but I think the trend is already becoming clear... Thanks, Richard