From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@mvista.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:53:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412195321.GA15586@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412124022.6256b8ed@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 04/12, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:20:45 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > exit_signals() checks signal_pending() before
> > retarget_shared_pending() but this is suboptimal. We can avoid the
> > while_each_thread() loop in case when there are no shared signals
> > visible to us.
> >
> > Add the has_pending_signals(shared_pending, blocked) check. We don
> > not use tsk->blocked directly but pass this sigset_t as an argument,
> > this is needed for the next patch.
> >
> > Note: we can optimize this more. while_each_thread(t) can check
> > t->blocked into account and stop after every pending signal has the
> > new target.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
>
> Nice. Do you have plans to implement that further optimisation?
Probably yes, this is straightforward...
> Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@linux.intel.com>
Thanks Matt, thanks all.
I'll reply to other emails tomorrow. I was distracted by other things,
sorry. Oh, as always :/
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 17:19 [RFC PATCH 0/6] signal: sigprocmask fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-11 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] signal: introduce retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 11:39 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-11 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] signal: retarget_shared_pending: consider shared/unblocked signals only Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 11:40 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-12 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-04-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of ->sigloc Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 11:38 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-11 17:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 12:07 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-12 14:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-14 19:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 18:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-14 20:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-14 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-11 17:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: signal: handle_signal() should use sigprocmask() Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 12:15 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-11 17:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: signal: sys_rt_sigreturn() " Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-12 12:17 ` Matt Fleming
2011-04-14 20:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110412195321.GA15586@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=nyoushchenko@mvista.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.