From: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Nadolski, Edmund" <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"dmilburn@redhat.com" <dmilburn@redhat.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Ciechanowski, Ed" <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>,
"Danecki, Jacek" <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
"Skirvin, Jeffrey D" <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>,
"Wojcik, Artur" <artur.wojcik@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] isci: simplify dma coherent allocation
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:44:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110413164425.GA4279@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302676349.30034.36.camel@dwillia2-linux>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thanks. We can do this a bit simpler and just move ram initialization
> completely out of the start path, where it does not really belong.
>
> I'll fold the fix below into the patch.
That looks much better than the initial version. I'm still not sure
there actually is much of a point of doing a lot of work in the
start state handler. Is there any fundamental reason for delaying work
from the normal init path?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-08 23:55 [PATCH, RFC] isci: simplify dma coherent allocation Edmund Nadolski
2011-04-13 6:32 ` Dan Williams
2011-04-13 16:44 ` hch [this message]
2011-04-13 19:44 ` Dan Williams
2011-04-13 23:41 ` Dan Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-02 12:15 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110413164425.GA4279@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=artur.wojcik@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmilburn@redhat.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.