From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Khoa Huynh <khoa@us.ibm.com>,
pbadari@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw-posix: Linearize direct I/O on Linux NFS
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:05:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110416020516.GB11264@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA8D5DF.5070503@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:33:51PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> To be honest with you, we should kill cache=none and just optimize only one
> case and live with it (like other commerical
> hypervisor). :(
cache=none is the only sane mode for qemu, modulo bugs in nfs or similar weird
protocols that no sane person should use for VM storage.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-16 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-15 13:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw-posix: Linearize direct I/O on Linux NFS Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-15 15:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 15:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-15 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 16:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 16:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-15 17:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 16:23 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-04-15 17:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 22:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-04-15 23:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 23:33 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-04-16 2:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-04-16 8:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-04-16 2:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 18:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 18:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110416020516.GB11264@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=khoa@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbadari@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.