From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] lockdep: Implement extra recursive-read lock tests
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:45:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110417095506.818055829@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110417094505.865828233@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-test-recursive-read.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2658 bytes --]
Lockdep is not able to detect simple rw deadlocks because it is not
tracking recursive read dependencies:
read_lock(A) --> spin_lock(B)
spin_lock(B) --> write_lock(A) /* should fail */
Furthermore, the following should not result in a deadlock for
recursive read locks:
read_lock(A) --> spin_lock(B)
spin_lock(B) --> read_lock(A) /* success */
Add these checks so that we may improve lockdep to accurately track
recursive read locks and report the correct answers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
lib/locking-selftest.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
Index: tip/lib/locking-selftest.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/lib/locking-selftest.c
+++ tip/lib/locking-selftest.c
@@ -185,13 +185,16 @@ static void init_shared_classes(void)
#define ML(x) mutex_lock(&mutex_##x)
#define MU(x) mutex_unlock(&mutex_##x)
+#define MLU(x) ML(x); MU(x)
#define MI(x) mutex_init(&mutex_##x)
#define WSL(x) down_write(&rwsem_##x)
#define WSU(x) up_write(&rwsem_##x)
+#define WSLU(x) WSL(x); WSU(x)
#define RSL(x) down_read(&rwsem_##x)
#define RSU(x) up_read(&rwsem_##x)
+#define RSLU(x) RSL(x); RSU(x)
#define RWSI(x) init_rwsem(&rwsem_##x)
#define LOCK_UNLOCK_2(x,y) LOCK(x); LOCK(y); UNLOCK(y); UNLOCK(x)
@@ -300,6 +303,50 @@ static void rsem_AA3(void)
RSL(X2); // this one should fail
}
+static void rwlock_spinlock_ABBA(void)
+{
+ RL(A);
+ LU(B);
+ RU(A);
+
+ L(B);
+ WLU(A); /* fail */
+ U(B);
+}
+
+static void rlock_spinlock_ABBA(void)
+{
+ RL(A);
+ LU(B);
+ RU(A);
+
+ L(B);
+ RLU(A); /* not fail */
+ U(B);
+}
+
+static void rwsem_mutex_ABBA(void)
+{
+ RSL(A);
+ MLU(B);
+ RSU(A);
+
+ ML(B);
+ WSLU(A); /* fail */
+ MU(B);
+}
+
+static void rsem_mutex_ABBA(void)
+{
+ RSL(A);
+ MLU(B);
+ RSU(A);
+
+ ML(B);
+ RSLU(A); /* fail */
+ MU(B);
+}
+
/*
* ABBA deadlock:
*/
@@ -1174,6 +1221,20 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
dotest(rsem_AA3, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
printk("\n");
+ print_testname("mixed write-spin-read-lock");
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rwlock_spinlock_ABBA, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rwsem_mutex_ABBA, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
+ printk("\n");
+
+ print_testname("mixed read-spin-read-lock");
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rlock_spinlock_ABBA, SUCCESS, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
+ printk(" |");
+ dotest(rsem_mutex_ABBA, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
+ printk("\n");
+
printk(" --------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-17 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-17 9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] lockdep: Remove redundant read checks Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: Annotate read/write states Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 13:34 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-18 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] lockdep: Seperate lock ids for read/write acquires Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 17:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 22:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] lockdep: Rename lock_list::class Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] lockdep: Maintain rw_state entries in locklist Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 13:37 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: Consider the rw_state of lock while validating the chain Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 3:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22 7:19 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 7:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 7:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22 8:01 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 8:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22 8:59 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 9:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-23 12:33 ` [PATCH] lockdep: ignore cached chain key for recursive read Yong Zhang
2011-04-23 13:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110417095506.818055829@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.