From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBoP1-0008U6-Pj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:22:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBoOw-00075C-06 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:22:07 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:52305) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBoOv-00074w-Hm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:22:01 -0400 From: "Jan-Simon =?iso-8859-1?q?M=F6ller?=" Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:21:54 +0200 References: <1302881578-5357-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20110418121926.GA3387@afflict.kos.to> In-Reply-To: <20110418121926.GA3387@afflict.kos.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104181521.54646.dl9pf@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/17] s390x: s390x-linux-user support Reply-To: dl9pf@gmx.de List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Riku Voipio , Alexander Graf , Aurelien Jarno , Richard Henderson Am Montag, 18. April 2011, 14:19:26 schrieb Riku Voipio: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:06:02PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > The patch looks OK, but I'd like to have a try with some s390x static > > > binaries. Such binaries are also useful for me to test that new patches > > > for linxu-user don't break targets I don't usually use. > > > > Sure - what exactly would you like there? I can easily compile a few. Do > > you want to have them added to the tests/ directory? > > busybox has so far been most useful. > Good idea, what about adding a collection of static busybox for the different arches? Not everyone testing has the compiler around for $ARCH . Best, Jan-Simon