From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] ide/atapi: Use table instead of switch for commands
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:44:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110425101437.GC8308@amit-x200.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303299015-11036-4-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
On (Wed) 20 Apr 2011 [13:30:13], Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/ide/atapi.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ide/atapi.c b/hw/ide/atapi.c
> index d161bf7..d0bf7fd 100644
> --- a/hw/ide/atapi.c
> +++ b/hw/ide/atapi.c
> @@ -533,10 +533,11 @@ static unsigned int event_status_media(IDEState *s,
> return 8; /* We wrote to 4 extra bytes from the header */
> }
>
> -static void handle_get_event_status_notification(IDEState *s,
> - uint8_t *buf,
> - const uint8_t *packet)
> +static void cmd_get_event_status_notification(IDEState *s,
> + uint8_t *buf)
> {
> + const uint8_t *packet = buf;
> +
Exploiting packet == buf. But do we want to go away from that?
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-25 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 11:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] atapi: Some code restructuring Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] ide: Split atapi.c out Kevin Wolf
2011-04-25 10:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] ide/atapi: Factor commands out Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] ide/atapi: Use table instead of switch for commands Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 18:13 ` Blue Swirl
2011-04-21 8:13 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-04-25 10:14 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] ide/atapi: Replace bdrv_get_geometry calls by s->nb_sectors Kevin Wolf
2011-04-20 11:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] ide/atapi: Introduce CHECK_READY flag for commands Kevin Wolf
2011-04-25 10:19 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110425101437.GC8308@amit-x200.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.