From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc:sdhci:add support to request/free pins for controllers sharing hardware bus Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:58:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20110426065851.GA14534@pengutronix.de> References: <5EB3BFCD089AD643B9BB63439F5FD5E9A127@SHAASIEXM01.ASIA.ROOT.PRI> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:37794 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757059Ab1DZG64 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 02:58:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Ball , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Binghua.Duan@csr.com, andreiw@motorola.com, prakity@marvell.com --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > * Where is the patch that implements the get_shared_pins() hook in > > =A0your driver? > We send the common level patch ahead to get the upstream agreement so > that we can maintain our bottom level sdhci codes better. We will send > the special driver patch after some time. Hmm, why should be there a functionality if there is no user for it? A reference user helps people understand how it is intended to be used. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk22bSoACgkQD27XaX1/VRuqyQCfTPvx1T2Jrpe8peSk2H7ONkM9 4twAnjilc+eyZBU+i/+QTF8q+YhL8E1D =qFS0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--