From: pwaechtler@mac.com (Peter Waechtler)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: since when does ARM map the kernel memory in sections?
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:00:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104262100.42670.pwaechtler@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikNqO_xGgsUrZ2fid4ZmA8P6AoHLA@mail.gmail.com>
Am Dienstag, 26. April 2011, 12:33:29 schrieb Per Forlin:
> On 23 April 2011 11:23, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > 2011/4/22 Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>:
> >> Plus, I was told new MMC standard has "write reliable" option...
> >
> > I think Per F?rlin looked into reliable write. The latest eMMC cards
> > has this, but OTOMH it was too darn slow to be used on current
> > chips/"cards".
> >
> > Per, Sebastian: any details?
>
> I had plans to add reliable writes and do benchmarking but I never got
> to it. Right now I have no plans to pick it up.
>
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
>
> Regards,
> Per
As far as I understood the spec, reliable write only makes statements like
either the old data is still intact - or the new data was written
(completely).
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 18:52 since when does ARM map the kernel memory in sections? Peter Wächtler
2011-04-12 19:11 ` Colin Cross
2011-04-13 18:19 ` Peter Wächtler
2011-04-12 19:20 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-04-12 20:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-13 15:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-13 20:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-18 13:52 ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-18 17:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-18 17:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-22 15:47 ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-23 9:23 ` Linus Walleij
2011-04-26 10:33 ` Per Forlin
2011-04-26 19:00 ` Peter Waechtler [this message]
2011-04-26 19:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-26 20:38 ` MMC and reliable write - was: " Peter Waechtler
2011-04-26 22:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-27 1:13 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-04-27 13:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-27 19:18 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-04-27 19:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-03 8:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-06-06 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2011-06-06 20:38 ` Peter Waechtler
2011-04-26 20:24 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-04-26 22:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-27 0:27 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-04-27 13:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-27 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-04-27 18:50 ` Peter Waechtler
2011-04-27 18:58 ` Andrei Warkentin
2011-04-18 19:21 ` Peter Waechtler
2011-04-18 17:24 ` Pavel Machek
2011-04-19 0:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2011-04-13 6:51 ` Peter Wächtler
2011-04-13 15:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-04-13 18:35 ` Peter Wächtler
2011-04-12 20:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-28 20:26 Peter Waechtler
2011-04-28 21:38 ` Andrei Warkentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201104262100.42670.pwaechtler@mac.com \
--to=pwaechtler@mac.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.