From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: + arm-use-asm-generic-bitops-leh.patch added to -mm tree Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:29:14 -0700 Message-ID: <201104262129.p3QLTEN8020630@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:57491 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932280Ab1DZVaU (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:30:20 -0400 Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org Cc: akinobu.mita@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, gerg@uclinux.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com The patch titled arm: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is arm-use-asm-generic-bitops-leh.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find out what to do about this The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ ------------------------------------------------------ Subject: arm: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h From: Akinobu Mita The previous style change enables to use asm-generic/bitops/le.h on arm. Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Russell King Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Greg Ungerer Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h | 43 +++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff -puN arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h~arm-use-asm-generic-bitops-leh arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h~arm-use-asm-generic-bitops-leh +++ a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h @@ -203,8 +203,6 @@ extern int _find_next_bit_be(const unsig #define find_first_bit(p,sz) _find_first_bit_le(p,sz) #define find_next_bit(p,sz,off) _find_next_bit_le(p,sz,off) -#define WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(x) ((x)) - #else /* * These are the big endian, atomic definitions. @@ -214,8 +212,6 @@ extern int _find_next_bit_be(const unsig #define find_first_bit(p,sz) _find_first_bit_be(p,sz) #define find_next_bit(p,sz,off) _find_next_bit_be(p,sz,off) -#define WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(x) ((x) ^ 0x18) - #endif #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 5 @@ -287,40 +283,7 @@ static inline int fls(int x) #include #include -static inline void __set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr) -{ - __set_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} - -static inline void __clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr) -{ - __clear_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} - -static inline int __test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr) -{ - return __test_and_set_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} - -static inline int test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr) -{ - return test_and_set_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} - -static inline int __test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr) -{ - return __test_and_clear_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} - -static inline int test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr) -{ - return test_and_clear_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} - -static inline int test_bit_le(int nr, const void *addr) -{ - return test_bit(WORD_BITOFF_TO_LE(nr), addr); -} +#ifdef __ARMEB__ static inline int find_first_zero_bit_le(const void *p, unsigned size) { @@ -340,6 +303,10 @@ static inline int find_next_bit_le(const } #define find_next_bit_le find_next_bit_le +#endif + +#include + /* * Ext2 is defined to use little-endian byte ordering. */ _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from akinobu.mita@gmail.com are linux-next.patch arch-add-define-for-each-of-optimized-find-bitops.patch bitops-add-ifndef-for-each-of-find-bitops.patch arch-remove-config_generic_find_next_bitbit_lelast_bit.patch arm-use-asm-generic-bitops-leh.patch s390-use-asm-generic-bitops-leh.patch m68knommu-fix-build-error-due-to-the-lack-of-find_next_bit_le.patch