From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ASoC: DAPM: Pass snd_dapm_soc_update
	as parameter
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:23:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20110428222315.GA19741@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1304009173-5786-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
	<1304009173-5786-2-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de>
	<20110428194054.GB16837@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<4DB9D06C.5090006@metafoo.de>
	<20110428205827.GA18350@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<4DB9DB16.1060507@metafoo.de>
	<20110428214817.GA19535@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<4DB9E454.3060903@metafoo.de>
	<20110428221800.GC19535@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org>
Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
	[80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E075D2442B
	for <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>;
	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110428221800.GC19535@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>,
	<mailto:alsa-devel-request@alsa-project.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:18:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:04:04AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > On 04/28/2011 11:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > Moving to the card doesn't seem helpful, while we're currently doing one
> > > update at once it's not immediately obvious that we want to keep doing
> > > that indefinitely.

> > But keeping it in the dapm context would limit us to one update per context
> > which doesn't seem very sustainable either.

> Though for global state changes like this that's pretty much irrelevant
> as we need to walk the entire graph at once.

BTW, this means that my above comment was too hasty; I can't actually
see a situation where we'd ever want to have multiple updates in flight.
Though I also don't immediately see a need to move as the update gets
applied to a specific context anyway and it seems nicer to just stop
using the stream events for anything other than the integration with the
CPU DMA.