From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: John Weekes <lists.xen@nuclearfallout.net>,
ke.yu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com
Cc: mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
winston.l.wang@intel.com, gang.wei@intel.com
Subject: Re: Performance difference between Xen versions
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 15:36:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502193623.GB14666@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DBF0306.8040000@nuclearfallout.net>
> # xenpm get-cpufreq-para 5
> cpu id : 5
> affected_cpus : 5
> cpuinfo frequency : max [2268000] min [1600000] cur [2268000]
> scaling_driver : acpi-cpufreq
> scaling_avail_gov : userspace performance powersave ondemand
> current_governor : ondemand
> ondemand specific :
> sampling_rate : max [10000000] min [10000] cur [20000]
> up_threshold : 80
> scaling_avail_freq : *2268000 2267000 2133000 2000000 1867000
> 1733000 1600000
> scaling frequency : max [2268000] min [1600000] cur [2268000]
> turbo mode : enabled
>
> Does it do it silently? If so, how can I see the true frequency?
<looks aroud> You are asking me I presume?
Ummm, no idea. I would actually email the authors of the those patches (CC-ed here).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 12:32 Performance difference between Xen versions Juergen Gross
2011-04-29 13:28 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-29 13:35 ` Juergen Gross
2011-04-29 14:58 ` Keir Fraser
2011-04-29 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 5:31 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 6:41 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-02 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 8:00 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-02 8:23 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 8:49 ` Keir Fraser
2011-05-03 3:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-06 13:49 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-06 14:27 ` Jan Beulich
2011-05-11 6:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-11 6:23 ` Juergen Gross
2011-05-02 17:52 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 18:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-05-02 18:43 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 19:16 ` John Weekes
2011-05-02 19:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-05-02 19:54 ` John Weekes
2011-05-03 2:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-03 3:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-03 3:39 ` John Weekes
2011-05-03 7:23 ` Tian, Kevin
[not found] ` <4DBF13BB.3000309@nuclearfallout.net>
2011-05-03 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110502193623.GB14666@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=ke.yu@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lists.xen@nuclearfallout.net \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=winston.l.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.