From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD) Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 22:18:42 +0200 Subject: AT91: PMC definitions are plaform-depenent In-Reply-To: References: <1304352989.17141.9.camel@redbox> <20110502193246.GL1212@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <20110502201842.GA13724@game.jcrosoft.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 22:12 Mon 02 May , Andrew Victor wrote: > hi Jean-Christophe, > > > no need the PMC is at the same address on all soc > > That just happens to be the case with the currently-released ARM9-based AT91's. > You just need to look at the base-addresses of the other > system-peripherals to see there is not much consistency. > > So I don't want to design a system that will break (or that we have to > hack around) if/when Atmel releases a new processor where the PMC is > at a different address. even the new 5Series have the same PMC Best Regards, J.