All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "L. Alberto Giménez" <agimenez@sysvalve.es>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dgiagio@gmail.com,
	dborca@yahoo.com, pmcenery@gmail.com, david.hill@ubisoft.com,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipheth.c: Enable IP header alignment
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502211245.GA18334@bart.evergreen.loc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502.124622.226785624.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 12:46:22PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> 
> Why did this break things?

Hi, I don't know. As upstream is unresponsive and is applying patches to his
private repo without submitting them to the list (which I can understand), I
decided to submit the particular fix so mainline users can get tethering working
again.

I received a forwarded email with the patch (I think that's because I submitted
the driver to mainline) asking for the mainline driver status and if it was
being maintained.

> 
> I'm not applying a fix when nobody can explain the reason why:
> 
> 1) Things broke in the first place
> 2) Forcing reservation of 2 bytes fixes things

Honestly, I can't answer either of those ones. I just submitted a patch that
*seemed* to fix the problem (I don't own an iPhone device since long time ago),
after explictly requesting upstream to submit by himself, and getting a
negative.


> Where is the built in assumption about "2" and why does it exist?  Why
> can't we fix this code not to have such assumptions in the first
> place?

Ditto.

At this point, I think that David, Diego or Daniel should step in if they want
to keep on with this discussion. I won't have problems if you want to take this
off-list.

Best regards,

-- 
L. Alberto Giménez
JabberID agimenez@jabber.sysvalve.es
GnuPG key ID 0x3BAABDE1

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-01 11:00 [PATCH] ipheth.c: Enable IP header alignment L. Alberto Giménez
2011-05-01 15:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-01 15:46   ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-02 19:35   ` L. Alberto Giménez
2011-05-02 19:46     ` David Miller
2011-05-02 21:12       ` L. Alberto Giménez [this message]
2011-05-02 21:04     ` Ben Hutchings
2011-05-03 16:57       ` L. Alberto Giménez
2011-05-03 17:18         ` David Hill
2011-05-03 17:18           ` David Hill
2011-05-03 17:33           ` Paul McEnery
2011-05-03 17:41             ` David Hill
2011-05-03 22:45               ` Paul McEnery
2011-05-03 17:49           ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ipheth: Properly distinguish length and alignment in URBs and skbs Ben Hutchings
2011-05-08 22:46             ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110502211245.GA18334@bart.evergreen.loc \
    --to=agimenez@sysvalve.es \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.hill@ubisoft.com \
    --cc=dborca@yahoo.com \
    --cc=dgiagio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmcenery@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.