All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, iisaman@umich.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd41: compare request's opcnt with session's maxops at nfsd4_sequence
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:48:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110503034841.GA16120@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB7AE19.3080308@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:48:09PM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> 
> 
> J. Bruce Fields:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:09:58AM +0800, Mi Jinlong wrote:
> >> Make sure nfs server can distinguish request contains more ops
> >> than channel allowed.
> > 
> > Yes, sequence looks like a reasonable op to catch this error.  The spec
> > doesn't care as far as I can tell (and it's a buggy-client case, so why
> > should it), and we already check that any compound not starting with a
> > sequence has only one op.
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |    5 +++++
> >>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> >> index fbde6f7..4f9fc68 100644
> >> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> >> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> >> @@ -1749,6 +1749,11 @@ nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> >>  	if (!session)
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  
> >> +	status = nfserr_too_many_ops;
> >> +	if (((struct nfsd4_compoundargs *)rqstp->rq_argp)->opcnt >
> > 
> > Kind of a cumbersome construction, though.
> > 
> > Eh, maybe overkill, but how about this?:
> 
>   That's great!

But note we're making a bunch of the pynfs tests fail now, since they
aren't careful about how many ops they use in a compound.  For example,
LKPP1d fails for me now.  Note it might not fail for you if you put the
pynfs test directory right at the root of the export tree?

I don't think pynfs hsould be using absolute paths for everything.  And
it should probably be doing single-component lookups in a loop instead
of depending on being able to do the whole lookup in one compound,
unless it's willing to adapt the compounds to take into account
maxops--which sounds to me like more trouble than it's worth.

The server could probably also raise its limit, though.

--b.

> 
> -- 
> ----
> thanks
> Mi Jinlong
> 
> > 
> > --b.
> > 
> > commit d5eee1629fb9d3a55e5793d156026248c14cb46c
> > Author: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > Date:   Wed Apr 27 09:09:58 2011 +0800
> > 
> >     nfsd41: compare request's opcnt with session's maxops at nfsd4_sequence
> >     
> >     Make sure nfs server errors out if request contains more ops
> >     than channel allows.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >     [bfields@redhat.com: use helper function]
> >     Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index fbde6f7..487ba47 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -1721,6 +1721,13 @@ static void nfsd4_sequence_check_conn(struct nfsd4_conn *new, struct nfsd4_sessi
> >  	return;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool nfsd4_session_too_many_ops(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_session *session)
> > +{
> > +	struct nfsd4_compoundargs *args = rqstp->rq_argp;
> > +
> > +	return args->opcnt > session->se_fchannel.maxops;
> > +}
> > +
> >  __be32
> >  nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> >  	       struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > @@ -1749,6 +1756,10 @@ nfsd4_sequence(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> >  	if (!session)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > +	status = nfserr_too_many_ops;
> > +	if (nfsd4_session_too_many_ops(rqstp, session))
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> >  	status = nfserr_badslot;
> >  	if (seq->slotid >= session->se_fchannel.maxreqs)
> >  		goto out;
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-03  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-27  1:09 [PATCH] nfsd41: compare request's opcnt with session's maxops at nfsd4_sequence Mi Jinlong
2011-04-27  2:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-04-27  5:48   ` Mi Jinlong
2011-05-03  3:48     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2011-05-09  9:26       ` Mi Jinlong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110503034841.GA16120@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=iisaman@umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.