From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 15:37:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110505133743.GD5323@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110505133002.GA7724@localhost>
On Thu 05-05-11 21:30:02, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> [allyesconfig compile tested]
> [it modifies 3 filesystems all at once, is it OK?]
>
> Remove two unused struct writeback_control fields:
>
> .encountered_congestion (completley unused)
> .nonblocking (never set, checked/showed in XFS,NFS/btrfs)
>
> Proposed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Yep. Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
BTW: I've noticed you removed ->for_background check from
nfs_write_inode(). That's OK because for_background => WB_SYNC_NONE but I
guess you should mention it in the changelog.
Honza
> ---
> fs/nfs/write.c | 3 +--
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/writeback.h | 2 --
> include/trace/events/btrfs.h | 6 ++----
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2011-05-05 21:10:01.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2011-05-05 21:10:37.000000000 +0800
> @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ xfs_vm_writepage(
> offset = page_offset(page);
> type = IO_OVERWRITE;
>
> - if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE && wbc->nonblocking)
> + if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> nonblocking = 1;
>
> do {
> --- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/btrfs.h 2011-05-05 21:07:31.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/include/trace/events/btrfs.h 2011-05-05 21:09:47.000000000 +0800
> @@ -284,7 +284,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs__writepage,
> __field( long, pages_skipped )
> __field( loff_t, range_start )
> __field( loff_t, range_end )
> - __field( char, nonblocking )
> __field( char, for_kupdate )
> __field( char, for_reclaim )
> __field( char, range_cyclic )
> @@ -299,7 +298,6 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs__writepage,
> __entry->pages_skipped = wbc->pages_skipped;
> __entry->range_start = wbc->range_start;
> __entry->range_end = wbc->range_end;
> - __entry->nonblocking = wbc->nonblocking;
> __entry->for_kupdate = wbc->for_kupdate;
> __entry->for_reclaim = wbc->for_reclaim;
> __entry->range_cyclic = wbc->range_cyclic;
> @@ -310,13 +308,13 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs__writepage,
>
> TP_printk("root = %llu(%s), ino = %lu, page_index = %lu, "
> "nr_to_write = %ld, pages_skipped = %ld, range_start = %llu, "
> - "range_end = %llu, nonblocking = %d, for_kupdate = %d, "
> + "range_end = %llu, for_kupdate = %d, "
> "for_reclaim = %d, range_cyclic = %d, writeback_index = %lu",
> show_root_type(__entry->root_objectid),
> (unsigned long)__entry->ino, __entry->index,
> __entry->nr_to_write, __entry->pages_skipped,
> __entry->range_start, __entry->range_end,
> - __entry->nonblocking, __entry->for_kupdate,
> + __entry->for_kupdate,
> __entry->for_reclaim, __entry->range_cyclic,
> (unsigned long)__entry->writeback_index)
> );
> --- linux-next.orig/fs/nfs/write.c 2011-05-05 21:10:52.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/fs/nfs/write.c 2011-05-05 21:11:19.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1564,8 +1564,7 @@ int nfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode,
> int status;
> bool sync = true;
>
> - if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE || wbc->nonblocking ||
> - wbc->for_background)
> + if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> sync = false;
>
> status = pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(inode, sync);
> --- linux-next.orig/include/linux/writeback.h 2011-05-05 21:07:16.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/include/linux/writeback.h 2011-05-05 21:13:20.000000000 +0800
> @@ -36,8 +36,6 @@ struct writeback_control {
> loff_t range_start;
> loff_t range_end;
>
> - unsigned nonblocking:1; /* Don't get stuck on request queues */
> - unsigned encountered_congestion:1; /* An output: a queue is full */
> unsigned for_kupdate:1; /* A kupdate writeback */
> unsigned for_background:1; /* A background writeback */
> unsigned tagged_sync:1; /* do livelock prevention for sync */
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-05 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-05 13:30 [PATCH] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 13:37 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-05-05 13:59 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110505133743.GD5323@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.