From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754630Ab1EHPl5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2011 11:41:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22866 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752790Ab1EHPly (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2011 11:41:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 17:40:51 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH ptrace] ptrace: fix signal->wait_chldexit usage in task_clear_group_stop_trapping() Message-ID: <20110508154051.GA11251@redhat.com> References: <20110506095222.GB8824@htj.dyndns.org> <20110508133543.GA4820@redhat.com> <20110508140221.GA29783@htj.dyndns.org> <20110508153435.GA11046@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110508153435.GA11046@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Of course, we should take siglock. I meant, we could probably make > > static void ptrace_s_stopped_traced(struct task_struct *task) > { > bool wait_trap = false; > > spin_lock(&task->sighand->siglock); this needs lock_task_sighand() of course. And in any case this is minor. Oleg.